In his masterwork, The Republic, the classical philosopher
Plato gives one of the most famous images in literaturethe cave allegory. Not only
do we want to share this with you, but we also want to add our own allegory from a novella
we wrote called Socrates Dances in Heaven. Not that ours is in the same league with
Platosbut it was inspired by Platos image, and this is our way of paying
tribute to a great work.
First, heres Plato (Book VII of The Republic, right
at the beginning), putting an image about education in the mouth of his teacher, Socrates
(the "I" in the dialogue), as Socrates discusses justice with Glaucon, one of
Platos brothers:
"Lets compare our own education and understanding of
the world to people in a caveto human beings in an underground, cave-like dwelling
with a long and wide entrance open toward the light. From childhood on, the people who
live in this cave have their legs and necks chained so that they can see only straight
ahead in front of them. The chains keep them from turning their heads in any other
direction.
"The only light in the cave is from a fire burning far above
the people and behind them. Between the fire and the chained people theres a road,
built on a kind of stage structure such as you find in theatersagain above and
behind the peoplealong which move other people and animals, some carrying things,
some not, some speaking, some not."
"This is a bizarre image of of bizarre prisoners,"
Glaucon said.
"But theyre just like us," I replied. "Do you
think they can see anything of themselves and one another? Or do they merely see the
images or shadows that fall on the side of the cave facing them, cast by the fire above
them?"
"How could they see one another," Glaucon said, "if
theyre forced to keep their heads turned in one direction throughout their whole
lives?"
"And what about the shadows on the wall [the men and animals
that the shadows on the wall represent that cant be seen either]? Isnt it the
same with them?"
"Certainly."
"And if the chained people happened to talk to each other,
wouldnt they think it right to give names and descriptions to the shadows they saw
in front of them, projected on the cave wall?"
"Of course they would."
"And what if the cave had an echo, so that the side facing
the chained people seemed to produce a sound? Whenever one of the men walking above and
behind them spoke, would the chained people believe anything other than that the shadow on
the wall was addressing them?"
"No, by Zeus," Glaucon said, "I dont think
theyd believe anything else."
"Then for sure," I said, "what the chained people
held to be the truth would be nothing more than shadows."
"Certainly," Glaucon assented.
"Now lets imagine," I said, "what freedom
from their chains would be like. Suppose one of the chained people, a man, was released
and immediately forced to stand up and look toward the light. Hed necessarily be
doing this in pain, because the light would be dazzling. At first, he wouldnt be
able to make out the shapes of the men and animals walking up on the elevated road in
front of himwhich hed seen before only as shadows.
"What do you suppose this man would say if someone told him
that hed only been looking at shadows and now he was seeing real things? And how
would the man reply if he were asked to describe the nature of these real things [the
shadows of which hed been looking at all his life]? Wouldnt he feel at a loss?
And wouldnt he be tempted to think that what hed looked at all his life must
be truer than what hes seeing right now?"
"Yes," replied Glaucon.
"What if the man were forced to look right into the light of
the fire? Wouldnt it hurt his eyes? Wouldnt he turn away from it? And further,
wouldnt he turn back to the shadows, thinking them more clear and therefore more
true than the light itself?"
"Of course he would," Glaucon said.
"Now," I said, "what if someone were to drag that
man up to the light, forcing him through a steep and rugged ascent into the light
itselfwhere he couldnt see anything and his eyes hurt? Wouldnt the man
be distressed, even angry? And wouldnt he be unable to see anything, even what was
being presented to him as the truth of things?
"At least at the begininng, he couldnt see
anything," Glaucon agreed.
"Hed need time and practice, perhaps learning to
perceive the truth in stagesfirst seeing the dim images of things as he had with
shadows before, maybe then seeing things reflected in water, and then finally being able
to look at the real men and animals that had before just been shadows on his cave wall. As
for the bright sky, hed have to start by looking at it first at night, seeing only
the light of the moon and stars, and that way gradually accustom his sight to the full
light of day."
"Of course."
"Then as he was able to see the sun, hed be able to
contemplate its nature, to realize that it was the source of seasons and light and the
shadows that he and his cave companions had been staring at all their lives."
"Yes, hed no doubt arrive at this conclusion."
"And wouldnt this man, being awake to the light, think
that his original home lacked real knowledge? And wouldnt he feel happy at his own
transformation and pity those back in the cave?"
"Without a doubt."
"How do you think hed feel as he thought back on the
honors and awards given to those whose perception in the cave was sharpest? Do you think
hed want those honors and awards? Would he envy those cave-dwellers who received
prizes because they could make out the shadows better than anyone else or see which shadow
came first and which next? Or would he rather undergo anything, even menial labor, rather
than think and live the way the cave-dwellers lived?"
"Hed probably rather suffer anything than go back to
living the cave-dweller way," Glaucon said.
"Now, lets imagine what would happen if that man
returned to his place in the cave. Wouldnt his eyes be blinded, as a man coming into
darkness suddenly from sunlight?"
"Very much so."
"And what if the manbefore his cave-sight
returnedwere to try to compete with other cave-dwellers about the shadows?
Wouldnt he seem ridiculous to the others? And during the time while his sight was
adapting to the darkness, wouldnt his former friends say that his sight had been
ruined by going up to the light? And that he should never try to go back up to the light
again, because it would destroy his sight again? Might not his friends even say that
anyone who tried to lead him back to the light ought to be stopped, even killed if they
could legally kill him?"
"Theres no question about it."
"All right, then. Lets take this whole allegory and
apply it to everything weve said so far. What we see with our eyes and experience
through our senses is like the cave, while the sun, the center of the universe, is like
the fire that illumines the cave. As you probably expectand I agree with your
expectationsthe ascent from the cave is like the souls ascent to the Realm of
Ideas. Of course, just because we agree on this doesnt make it true; there may be
some god or power somewhere who knows the truth about these things. But this is the way it
appears to me: that of all the subjects of human knowledge, the last and most difficult to
be seen is the Idea of the Good.
"But once seen, it is clear that the Idea of the Good is the
source of everything. In the visible realm, its the source of physical light, and in
the consciousness realm, its the source of truth and wisdom. And any person who
wants to act with justice, either personally or publicly, must see it."
[The rendition we use here is our own, though we recommend
translations by Allan Bloom and Robin Waterfield. Its always useful to compare
translations of Platos works. By the way, if the classical scholar R. E. Allen
produces a translation, get it; hes one of our favorite translators.]
Now heres our "ship allegory" from our novella, Socrates
Dances in Heaven. Socrates is talking with William Shakespeare, Benjamin Franklin, and
the fourth-century Alexandrian philosopher Hypatia:
Socrates pauses to stare at her a moment. "Thats a
wonderful image, Hypatia. And it makes me recall a fable I once used."
"You used fables, Socrates?" Shakespeare asks.
"Yes, of course. What you now possess as Platos work, The
Republic, is one long fable. Plato and I, as well as others who worked with us,
realized that if we were to tap the highest capacities of human thought, we needed to
appeal not only to higher reason but also to what you would call higher intuition and
higher emotions. So we used fables and stories and allegories. May I tell you one?"
They all agree that he should.
"Well," Socrates begins, "there is a bark, a great
ship, I think you would say, afloat on a great ocean. The ship speeds ahead on a great
voyage with a grand purpose, though some of its passengers are not aware of the purpose or
they have forgotten it over time, especially those sitting inside.
"The inside-sitters, or insiders Ill call them, enjoy
the comfort of the inside, so they seldom if ever leave it. They dont go out into
the sea air, so at times they even forget theyre afloat. Some who have been inside
for many years even deny that they are afloat. Or they allow that they may be afloat but
that they are simply drifting on the sea, with no purpose at all.
"Outside are those who stand in the wind and sometimes the
cold. They stare ahead and try to see as much of the ships grand purpose as their
individual vision will allow. They expand their perspective as much as possible, seeing as
much of the ship as they can, studying the insiders and the outsiders. They study the sea,
and they stare into the space before them, sometimes seeing a beautiful morning, sometimes
a dark night, sometimes calm, sometimes a storm.
"They sense that, for some reason or other that they can only
dimly recall, this is their job. They are to be at this post. In my day, we called such
persons philosophers. For my fable, I shall call them Watchers.
"Now a problem arises; lets say a storm is coming or
perhaps the ship is about to hit some huge obstacle, a rock or
"An iceberg?" Hypatia ventures.
"Im not certain what an iceberg is," Socrates
replies, "But an iceberg will do. So the outsiders notice that something is strange
in the sea before them, and they try to determine the source of the strangeness. They may
disagree as to the source, but they agree that something is amiss and that they should get
someone to turn the ship.
"So some of the outsiders go inside and try to warn the
insiders. But feeling nothing, the insiders are skeptical. They want the Watchers to go
away, so they ignore them, even grumbling that the Watchers are implying that the ship is
going in some direction it shouldnt be, while the insiders claim that the ship is
going in no direction at all, so it either cant be in trouble or the trouble is
simply that it is directionless, and theres nothing anyone can do about that.
"The Watchers, of course, realize that if they remain with
these insiders, the ship will go down, and all will perish, including the insiders. So
they try to find those who can change the direction of the ship, those who, though living
inside, are not mere insiders but have committed themselves to running the ship.
"Now those who run the ship are of three types. First and
foremost are those who are good, expert guides and know navigation, and these have
selflessly stood at their posts to guide the ship through difficult or calm waters.
"The second type is represented by those who, though
committed to running the ship, lack either the training or the experience. They have the
dedication, but they lack the knowledge or they are untried.
"The last type is represented by those whoeither with
knowledge or without knowledege of running the shipwant to run it for their own
imagined gain. They focus only on themselves, and so almost perversely, they try to
deceive the insiders about whats really happening. Worse, they try to thwart the
Watchers by blocking their watching or by keeping the Watchers away from the insiders.
"So the immediate task for the Watchers is to contact the
selfless ones while avoiding the selfish ones, though the latter sometimes disguise
themselves as the former, making the task more difficult. Further, the Watchers must try
to find those who have both the knowledge and experience to turn the ship.
"To make matters more difficult, the Watchers must try to
inform the insiders about whats really happening, so that as the ship turns, the
insiders can go with it, rather than joining the selfish ones in trying to turn the ship
to some lesser aim. Since the selfish ones try to deceive the insiders, some insiders will
take the selfish ones to be their saviors, following the selfish ones in great movements,
blocking the work of the Watchers.
"But the Watchers never quit. They know their work is
difficult, but they also know what it is, and they know the types of people who inhabit
the ship. Even more, they know their own character, and theyve learned through hard
trials how to be consistent with that character."
As Socrates pauses, apparently finished, Franklin says, "This
is a fine image, my friend. Is this where we find ourselves in our work on this
planet?"
"I think so," replies Socrates. "We find ourselves
struggling with the deceivers and the insiders, but we must never, even in a crisis, lose
sight of the ships great destiny and our role in that destiny."
Hypatia puts her hand on her friends shoulder. "This is
an allegory of which Plato himself would be proud, I think."
"I hope so," replies Socrates.