![]()
True Facts: Climate
Changes
Get Educated: All the Main
Issues and Points
Return to Website Introduction
Any and all "environmental threats" proposed by humans were far exceeded by all natural cataclysms that have happened in history, and life continued and evolved just fine. So, when you hear about any "threat" proposed by anyone in the social power structure, is it a threat that they have 'created' , or something that will make no difference in the end that they can do nothing about but pretend they can .... it is all about implementation of manipulative political agenda, nothing more, with financial gain. You know this to be true, so why act like it's something different. Cui bono?
Documentary/Research: The Cloud Mystery [09/05/10] 6 Video clips [60:00]
![]()
"In 2005, scientists found evidence that the sun and the galaxy is determining the climate on Earth. For some reason, no scientific journal wanted to publish this. In this film, the UN climate consensus is seriously challenged - watch it, and judge for yourself. The duration of the documentary is 52 min. and is in 6 parts - called Cloud Mystery [...]" It's about the relationship between clouds, the sun and the galaxy and Earths climate.
Note: Novel Dutch research, validated in 2005 ... but generally suppressed, presenting the linkage between solar magnetic field and the degree of cloud cover on Earth, which influences temperatures. Note in part 2 how the IPCC slammed their research as a threat to the human-caused global warming agenda.What they could see was that when the magnetic activity on the sun was larger, then the temperature on the Earth was higher. The theory arose that the level of cosmic rays reaching Earth was also related to cloud formation on Earth. It proved to be correct. The level of cloud formation over the last hundred years has decreased with the decrease in cosmic rays that have been reaching Earth (because of changes in the magnetic field of the Sun) and the Earth climate has been getting generally warmer, especially in the northern hemisphere. Interesting series. Part 2 [9:56]| Part 3 [9:49]| Part 4 [9:56]| Part 5 [9:56] | Part 6 [3:31]
Mead began organizing for her conference, “The Atmosphere: Endangered and Endangering,” shortly after she had attended the United Nations Population Conference in Bucharest, Romania, in August 1974. She had already bullied American scientists with her Malthusian view that people were imperiling the environment. [...]"
1975 ‘Endangered Atmosphere’ Conference: Where the Global Warming Hoax Was Born by Marjorie Mazel Hecht PDF "“Global Warming” is, and always was, a policy for genocidal reduction of the world’s population. The preposterous claim that human-produced carbon dioxide will broil the Earth, melt the ice caps, and destroy human life, came out of a 1975 conference in Research Triangle Park, North Carolina, organized by the influential anthropologist Margaret Mead, president of the American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS), in 1974. Mead—whose 1928 book on the sex life of South Pacific Islanders was later found to be a fraud—recruited like-minded anti-population hoaxsters to the cause: Sow enough fear of man-caused climate change to force global cutbacks in industrial activity and halt Third World development. Mead’s leading recruits at the 1975 conference were climate-scare artist Stephen Schneider, population-freak biologist George Woodwell, and the current AAAS president John Holdren—all three of them disciples of Malthusian fanatic Paul Ehrlich, author of The Population Bomb. Guided by luminaries like these, conference discussion focused on the absurd choice of either feeding people or “saving the environment.”
Climate Changes All The Time: Earth's Ever-Changing Climate VIDEO [5:35] | "The Hockey Stick" vs. Actual Ice Core Data VIDEO [1:00] Earth is 'behaving' like it always has. | Satellite data debunks notion that "climate change is unnatural" | Journalists have warned of climate change for 100 years, but can’t 'decide' weather we face an ice age or warming The answer, in fact, is 'both'. The mainstream media knows little about hard science, long cycles and just how much humans do know, and don't know, about the complex living system that constitutes a planetary ecology.
CO2 and Global Temperature Issues: Global Temperature and Atmospheric CO2 over Geologic Time "For most of the past 600 million years global temperatures were usually 7 C (12.5 F) warmer than the present, and that CO2 concentration has rarely fallen below 1000 parts per million by volume. It is currently at less than 400 parts per million by volume. There has been very little correlation between past CO2 concentrations and past global temperatures. Though correlation does not necessarily imply causation, lack of correlation necessarily implies lack of causation. On this evidence, CO2 is at best a bit-part player in the climate. During the Cambrian era, 550 million years ago, CO2 concentration peaked at around 7000 ppmv, about 18 times today’s concentration. Yet the planet did not fry. It was during that era that the calcite corals first evolved: they did not suffer from the “ocean acidification” that is supposed to happen when atmospheric CO2 concentration is high. ..." No Rise of Atmospheric Carbon Dioxide Fraction in Past 160 Years, New Research Finds
Note: Most of the carbon dioxide emitted by human activity does not remain in the atmosphere, but is instead absorbed by the oceans and terrestrial ecosystems.
Ocean Acidification and Warming Issues: Undersea Volcanoes still being discovered: Total heat and CO2 contributed to oceans by nature unknowable. Scientists do NOT know the volume of CO2 and heat being added to the world's oceans by these volcanoes, which makes any theoretical guess about human contribution, if significant at all, totally unsupportable. There are estimated to be some 30,000 volcanoes under the ocean (Discovery Channel, Planet Green, 5/13/10), and these pour sulfur and other gases into the water, creating sulfuric acid , to the point where the vicinity of the volcano is like battery acid. Fire Under Arctic Ice: Volcanoes Have Been Blowing Their Tops In The Deep Ocean "A research team led by the Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution (WHOI) has uncovered evidence of explosive volcanic eruptions deep beneath the ice-covered surface of the Arctic Ocean. Such violent eruptions of splintered, fragmented rock--known as pyroclastic deposits -- were not thought possible at great ocean depths because of the intense weight and pressure of water and because of the composition of seafloor magma and rock. ..."
Note: They 'assumed' such deep water volcanoes were impossible, so they 'assumed' the unexplained heat showing up in phenomenon such as "El Nino" had to be caused by humans. Study finds Arctic seabed afire with lava-spewing volcanoes "The Arctic seabed is as explosive geologically as it is politically judging by the "fountains" of gas and molten lava that have been blasting out of underwater volcanoes near the North Pole. “Explosive volatile discharge has clearly been a widespread, and ongoing, process,” according to an international team that sent unmanned probes to the strange fiery world beneath the Arctic ice. ..." Much of the ocean floor remains unexplored. It may be mapped with sonar, but the exact nature of the floor is unknown. Robert Ballard discovered the deep ocean thermal vents in 1977. Their total number and extent is still unknown. The total number of undersea active volcanoes is also unknown. Guesses as to how much heat is being added to the ocean by these sources are just that; guesses. Therefore, any "calculations of human contributions to planetary warming" are total bullshit, because all other sources of heat are not yet accounted for. Volcanic Seamounts Siphon Ocean Water Through The Seafloor "Scientists have known for decades that enormous quantities of ocean water circulate through the seafloor, flowing through the porous volcanic rock of the upper oceanic crust. In the process, the water extracts large amounts of heat from the crust, which is warmed by the constant flow of heat out of the Earth's interior. ..."
Supervolcanoes VIDEO [46:00] " The Yellowstone Caldera Super volcano explodes every 600,000 years. The last time was 600,000 years ago. It could accelerate and go off at any time, and when it does, it will throw so much ash and gases into the atmosphere that it will lower the global temperature 5 degrees C, cutting off much sunlight and destroying most, if not all of the human civilization. This is NOT a matter of "if' but when. The last time a supervolcano went off was 74,000 years ago, in Toba, Sumatra, and according to the history and analysis of human mitochondrial DNA, it nearing wiped out the whole civilization, reducing the population to a few thousand people on the whole planet ..... there is no possibility of an human action to change this event. Secondly, not all locations of supervolcanoes on Earth are known."
Note: Eighty percent of all volcanoes erupt under the ocean, injecting billions of tons of CO2 into the ocean water. There is no way to compute the amount that human CO2 impacts the biosphere, because not much is known about the total production of CO2 on the planet. Therefore, any carbon trading concept that is arrived at by ambitious financial planners is a scam that has no basis in reality.
New geologic evidence of past periods of oscillating, abrupt warming, and cooling "Recent laser imaging of the Earth’s surface provides new evidence for abrupt, fluctuating, warm and cool climatic episodes that could not have been caused by changes in atmospheric CO2. ..."
Earth Climate History Over Time [Climate Methods, Miocene Climate, Oligocene Climate, Late Eocene Climate, Early Eocene Climate, Paleocene Climate, Late Cretaceous Climate, Early Cretaceous Climate, Late Jurassic Climate, Early Jurassic Climate, Late Triassic Climate, Middle Triassic Climate, Early Triassic Climate, Late Permian Climate, Early Permian Climate, Latest Carboniferous Climate, Late Carboniferous Climate, Early Late Carboniferous, Early Carboniferous Climate, Late Devonian Climate, Middle Devonian Climate, Early Devonian Climate, Silurian Climate, Middle & Late Ordovician, Early Ordovician Climate, Middle and Upper Cambrian, Early Cambrian Climate]
Planetary Warming: Other planets are getting warmer and colder in sync with the Earth "At least since 1989, Triton has been undergoing a period of global warming. Percentage-wise, it’s a very large increase,” said Elliot, professor of Earth, Atmospheric and Planetary Sciences and director of the Wallace Astrophysical Observatory. The 5 percent increase on the absolute temperature scale from about minus-392 degrees Fahrenheit to about minus-389 degrees Fahrenheit would be like the Earth experiencing a jump of about 22 degrees Fahrenheit.” So there is Global Warming on at least 4 other bodies in our Solar System that co-insides with the recent warming on Earth. ..."
Note: Keep in mind that warming can change the thermal halocline currents and lead, on Earth to a situation of global cooling and a mini ice age. (see below)
Related: The Whole Solar System is Undergoing Global Warming | Mars Melt Hints at Solar, Not Human, Cause for Warming, Scientist Says
NASA Study Shows Sun Responsible for Planet Warming "A study from NASA’s Goddard Space Flight Center in Greenbelt, Maryland looking at climate data over the past century has concluded that solar variation has made a significant impact on the Earth’s climate. The report concludes that evidence for climate changes based on solar radiation can be traced back as far as the Industrial Revolution ..."
Hard Science: How Global Warming Can Chill the Planet "The Earth was emerging from an ice age 8,200 years ago. Seas were warming and life was heating up. Then quite abruptly and for a relatively short period of time -- about 100 years -- the entire globe chilled down again, by almost 10.8 degrees Fahrenheit (6 Centigrade). One widely held theory for the chill was the sudden release of a substantial amount of fresh water into the northern Atlantic. A lake twice the size of the Caspian Sea broke through an ice sheet that contained it over current day Minnesota and Canada, the evidence shows. It poured its fresh water into the salty Atlantic and changed the density of the ocean water. The oceans work on a sort of conveyor belt method to circulate cold and warm waters, thereby helping control cold, moderate, and warm areas of the globe. (Earth's climate is only partly affected by land temperatures and sunlight. Oceans, which store vast amounts of energy and are slow to warm up and cool down, contribute greatly to climate.) ..."
Related: Copenhagen climate change summit: The world is Cooling not warming says scientist Peter Taylor ... and we're not prepared "Climategate does not just demonstrate the corruption of science and peer-review; it also demonstrates the incompetence of specialists who do not understand planetary ecology, especially its cycles. We’re being fatally led up the wrong garden path by green businesses, politicians, the IPCC and their computer geeks with their doctored spreadsheets and forecasts. They need to get out more and study the real world – not their virtual reality – because, like the asset bubbles of the financial crisis, the global warming bubble is about to burst… ..." Report: World Unprepared for Climate Change (of Any Kind) "The United States (and every other country) face unprecedented environmental and economic challenges in the decades ahead. Foremost among them will be climate change, sea-level rise, altered weather patterns, declines in freshwater availability and quality, and loss of biodiversity," the group warned at the time. Facing such challenges at a time when the climate is changing means officials can no longer rely on the assumptions of the past, the new study says. "Moreover, climatic changes will be superimposed on social and economic changes that are altering the climate vulnerability of different regions and sectors of society, as well as their ability to cope," the Research Council said. ..."
NASA Shows Quiet Sun Means Cooling of Earth's Upper Atmosphere "New measurements from a NASA satellite show a dramatic cooling in the upper atmosphere that correlates with the declining phase of the current solar cycle. For the first time, researchers can show a timely link between the Sun and the climate of Earth's thermosphere, the region above 100 km, an essential step in making accurate predictions of climate change in the high atmosphere. ..."
New Little Ice Age Instead of Global Warming "Analysis of the sun's varying activity in the last two millennia indicates that contrary to the IPCC's speculation about " man-made global warming as high as 5.8° C within the next hundred years", a long period of cool climate with its coldest phase around ' 2030' is to be expected. ..."
Note: Schroeter Institute for Research in Cycles of Solar Activity, Germany Related: Solar Flare Effects on Weather
NOAA Info: The Arctic Oscillation Index goes strongly negative "In the last month, the Arctic Oscillation Index (AO) has gone strongly negative. You can see that it headed to its negative peak right about the time the Copenhagen Climate Conference started, so it is no wonder that they ironically experienced cold and snow there. It is also a setup for the record
snow and cold Canada and the USA has seen recently. ...With this change happening, the setup for an increased Arctic Sea Ice Maximum is enhanced this year, likely to happen sometime around March 1st, 2010. The Arctic Oscillation refers to opposing atmospheric pressure patterns in northern middle and high latitudes. The oscillation exhibits a “negative phase” with relatively high pressure over the polar region and low pressure at midlatitudes (about 45 degrees North), and a “positive phase” in which the pattern is reversed. In the positive phase, higher pressure at midlatitudes drives ocean storms farther north, and changes in the circulation pattern bring wetter weather to Alaska, Scotland and Scandinavia, as well as drier conditions to the western United States and the Mediterranean. In the positive phase, frigid winter air does not extend as far into the middle of North America as it would during the negative phase of the oscillation. This keeps much of the United States east of the Rocky Mountains warmer than normal, but leaves Greenland and Newfoundland colder than usual. Weather patterns in the negative phase are in general “opposite” to those of the positive phase, as illustrated below. Over most of the past century, the Arctic Oscillation alternated between its positive and negative phases. Starting in the 1970s, however, the oscillation has tended to stay in the positive phase, causing lower than normal arctic air pressure and higher than normal temperatures in much of the United States and northern Eurasia. As we see in this graph below, we’ve seen more red (positive) than blue (negative) phases of the AO in the last 30–40 years. Whether this is short period negative excursion or the start of a longer trend is unknown."
Note: Click on Graph to see large version. To see how this has progressed from 1950 until 2009, check this graph out! Much more details and more info in the story link above.
Related: Arctic Oscillation Index Data - Climate Prediction Center - NOAA
The Great Global Warming Swindle VIDEO [75:56] "The Ice is Melting, the Hurricanes are blowing. and it is all YOUR FAULT SCARED Don't Be, Its not True"
SPPI Paper on Climate Change, 29 Jan 2010 PDF "The United Nations climate panel faces a new challenge with scientists casting doubt on its claim that global temperatures are rising inexorably because of human pollution. In its last assessment the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) said the evidence that the world was warming was “unequivocal”. ..."
Note: Not any more.
Political and Financial Manipulation with 'Carbon' Schemes, and General News
Most Recent News on Top
..... Certainly not bad for a guy who supposedly was worth between one and two million dollars in 2000. A former Vice President who last year told a House committee he was putting all of his earnings into a non-profit company to "spread awareness of why we have to take on" global warming a year later buys a $9 million mansion with six fireplaces, five bedrooms, and nine bathrooms for him and his wife. Don't you think SOMEBODY should have reported it other than Fox News, the LA Times, and conservative bloggers? Where'd the money come from? Was this purchased by his non-profit corporation, and if so, how does he get away with that? And how about some questions about how green the house is? Are there solar panels and windmills to power this facility? If not, what are their plans? Forgetting all of that, if the Clintons, Bushes, or Cheneys bought such a place, do you think the media would cover it, at least as a human interest story? For over three years, Gore's adoring press have followed virtually every move he's made since becoming the voice of global warming. He buys a STUNNING villa as the unemployment rate stands at almost 10 percent and Americans are struggling to regain their footing after 2008's financial crisis, and the media are suddenly disinterested in him? On exactly which planet, be it cooling or warming, does THAT make any sense? [...]"
Stunning Pictures of Al Gore's New $9 Million Mansion Media Totally Ignored [05/04/10] "Al Gore purchased a $9 million mansion in the luxurious hills of Montecito,
California, recently, and with the exception of the Los Angeles Times and Fox News, America's media couldn't care less. You think it might be because the Gore-loving press wouldn't want people to consider the possibility that all of his global warming hysteria was really about lining his wallet and not saving the planet? Formulate a response to that question as you look at what all that money the former Vice President is making off of spreading this myth can buy
Related: Al Gore, Tipper Gore snap up Montecito-area villa [05/02/10] "Former Vice President Al Gore and his wife, Tipper, have added a Montecito-area property to their real estate holdings, reports the Montecito Journal. The couple spent $8,875,000 on an ocean-view villa on 1.5 acres with a swimming pool, spa and fountains, a real estate source familiar with the deal confirms. The Italian-style house has six fireplaces, five bedrooms and nine bathrooms. [...]"
The Pentagon is the planet's worst polluter [and it is EXEMPT from remediation] [03/01/10] "In evaluating the U.N. Climate Change Conference in Copenhagen -- with more than 15,000 participants from 192 countries, including more than 100 heads of state, as well as 100,000 demonstrators in the streets -- it is important to ask: How is it possible that the
worst polluter of carbon dioxide and other toxic emissions on the planet is not a focus of any conference discussion or proposed restrictions? By every measure, the Pentagon is the largest institutional user of petroleum products and energy in general. Yet the Pentagon has a blanket exemption in all international climate agreements. The Pentagon wars in Iraq and Afghanistan; its secret operations in Pakistan; its equipment on more than 1,000 U.S. bases around the world; its 6,000 facilities in the U.S.; all NATO operations; its aircraft carriers, jet aircraft, weapons testing, training and sales will not be counted against U.S. greenhouse gas limits or included in any count. The Feb. 17, 2007, Energy Bulletin detailed the oil consumption just for the Pentagon's aircraft, ships, ground vehicles and facilities that made it the single-largest oil consumer in the world. At the time, the U.S. Navy had 285 combat and support ships and around 4,000 operational aircraft. The U.S. Army had 28,000 armored vehicles, 140,000 High-Mobility Multipurpose Wheeled Vehicles, more than 4,000 combat helicopters, several hundred fixed-wing aircraft and 187,493 fleet vehicles. Except for 80 nuclear submarines and aircraft carriers, which spread radioactive pollution, all their other vehicles run on oil. Even according to rankings in the 2006 CIA World Factbook, only 35 countries (out of 210 in the world) consume more oil per day than the Pentagon. The U.S. military officially uses 320,000 barrels of oil a day. However, this total does not include fuel consumed by contractors or fuel consumed in leased and privatized facilities. Nor does it include the enormous energy and resources used to produce and maintain their death-dealing equipment or the bombs, grenades or missiles they fire. Steve Kretzmann, director of Oil Change International, reports: "The Iraq war was responsible for at least 141 million metric tons of carbon dioxide equivalent (MMTCO2e) from March 2003 through December 2007. ... The war emits more than 60 percent of all countries. ... This information is not readily available ... because military emissions abroad are exempt from national reporting requirements under U.S. law and the U.N. Framework Convention on Climate Change." (naomiklein.org, Dec. 10) Most scientists blame carbon dioxide emissions for greenhouse gases and climate change. Bryan Farrell in his new book, The Green Zone: The Environmental Costs of Militarism, says that "the greatest single assault on the environment, on all of us around the globe, comes from one agency ... the Armed Forces of the United States." Just how did the Pentagon come to be exempt from climate agreements? At the time of the Kyoto Accords negotiations, the U.S. demanded as a provision of signing that all of its military operations worldwide and all operations it participates in with the
U.N. and/or NATO be completely exempted from measurement or reductions. After securing this gigantic concession, the Bush administration then refused to sign the accords. In a May 18, 1998, article entitled "National security and military policy issues involved in the Kyoto treaty," Dr. Jeffrey Salmon described the Pentagon's position. He quotes then-Secretary of Defense William Cohen's 1997 annual report to Congress: "DoD strongly recommends that the United States insist on a national security provision in the climate change Protocol now being negotiated." (marshall.org) According to Salmon, this national security provision was put forth in a draft calling for "complete military exemption from greenhouse gas emissions limits. The draft includes multilateral operations such as NATO- and U.N.-sanctioned activities, but it also includes actions related very broadly to national security, which would appear to comprehend all forms of unilateral military actions and training for such actions." Salmon also quoted Undersecretary of State Stuart Eizenstat, who headed the U.S. delegation in Kyoto. Eizenstat reported that "every requirement the Defense Department and uniformed military who were at Kyoto by my side said they wanted, they got. This is self-defense, peacekeeping, humanitarian relief." Although the U.S. had already received these assurances in the negotiations, the U.S. Congress passed an explicit provision guaranteeing U.S. military exemption. Inter Press Service reported on May 21, 1998: "U.S. law makers, in the latest blow to international efforts to halt global warming, today exempted U.S. military operations from the Kyoto agreement which lays out binding commitments to reduce 'greenhouse gas' emissions. The House of Representatives passed an amendment to next year's military authorization bill that 'prohibits the restriction of armed forces under the Kyoto Protocol.'" Today in Copenhagen the same agreements and guidelines on greenhouse gases still hold. Yet it is extremely difficult to find even a mention of this glaring omission. According to environmental journalist Johanna Peace, military activities will continue to be exempt from an executive order signed by President Barack Obama that calls for federal agencies to reduce their greenhouse gas emissions by 2020. Peace states, "The military accounts for a full 80 percent of the federal government's energy demand." ..."
Note: Even IF man-made climate change was an accurate CONCEPT (there is NO proof of significant human cause, but the climate IS changing), asking PEOPLE to restrain their activities, while letting the Military Industrial Complex and World Shipping ( only 16 transport ships produce more pollution than all the vehicles in the US) stay exempt, and instituting 'airy-fairy' CONCEPTS like 'carbon credits', geared toward the CONTROL of people and the ENRICHMENT of the few, is INSANE, and without rational foundation.
Croat scientist warns ice age is overdue, could start in five years [02/26/10] "A leading scientist has revealed that Europe could be just five years away from the start of a new Ice Age. While climate change campaigners say global warming is the planet's biggest danger, renowned physicist Vladimir Paar says most of central Europe will soon be covered in ice. The freeze will be so complete that people will be able to walk from England to Ireland or across the North Sea from Scotland to northern Europe. Professor Paar, from Croatia's Zagreb University, has spent decades analysing previous ice ages in Europe and what caused them. "Most of Europe will be under ice, including Germany, Poland, France, Austria, Slovakia and a part of Slovenia," said the professor in an interview with the Index.hr. "Previous ice ages lasted about 70,000 years. That's a fact and the new ice age can't be avoided. "The big question is what will happen to the people of the Central European countries which will be under ice? "They might migrate to the south, or might stay, but with a huge increase in energy use," he warned. "This could happen in five, 10, 50 or 100 years, or even later. We can't predict it precisely, but it will come," he added. And the professor said that scientists think global warming is simply a natural part of the planet. "What I mean is that global warming is natural. Some 130,000 years ago the earth's temperature was the same as now, the level of CO2 was almost the same and the level of the sea was four metres higher. "They keep warning people about global warming, but half of America no longer believes it as they keep freezing," he said. And he added: "The reality is that mankind needs to start preparing for the ice age. We are at the end of the global warming period. The ice age is to follow. The global warming period should have ended a few thousands of years ago, we should have already been in the ice age. Therefore we do not know precisely when it could start - but soon." The Zagreb based scientist says it will still be possible for man to survive in the ice age, but the spending on energy will be enormous. "Food production also might be a problem. It would need to be produced in greenhouses with a lot of energy spent to heat it", commented the professor, who remains optimistic despite his predictions. ..."
Note: "Carbon credits" do nothing except make a few people wealthy over other peoples excuses to do nothing.
Unintended Consequences: Battling ‘Climate Change’ Creates Famine "A few weeks ago, Lord Christopher Monckton told me a distressing story about a visit to Haiti. He said that poverty in that troubled nation is so pervasive that many of its inhabitants have been reduced to eating mud pies. The term “mud pies” is not slang for a local staple made from locally-grown cereal crops. We’re talking about people reduced to eating actual dirt. Monckton watched Haitians form mud into the shape of pies, mixing in a sprinkling of whatever nutritional foodstuffs might be available (like oil and salt) and then “cooking” the mud pies in the sun. ...Al Gore prattles on and on about the theoretical deaths that will, someday, supposedly be caused by a climate crisis that exists only in a future predicted by flawed computer models, which are in turn “proven” only by the dubious temperature records created by self-aggrandizing scientists who have demonstrated their willingness to lie, fudge and bully in order to make their case. The reality – today – is that the actions that the world has taken in order to respond to this non-existent crisis has reduced the impoverished citizens of Haiti to eating mud-pies. But, in an odd way, the Haitians are the lucky ones. An earthquake brought worldwide attention to the plight of Haiti and badly-needed foodstuffs are flowing in. For the rest of the poor in the Third World, which has been so badly hurt by Gore’s self-serving agenda, the future looks increasingly bleak."
Carbon Currency: A New Beginning for Technocracy? "The new currency, simply called Carbon Currency, is designed to support a revolutionary new economic system based on energy (production, and consumption), instead of price. Our current price-based economic system and its related currencies that have supported capitalism, socialism, fascism and communism, is being herded to the slaughterhouse in order to make way for a new carbon-based world. Unfortunately for individual people living in this new system, it will also require authoritarian and centralized control over all aspects of life, from cradle to grave. ..."
Note: It's also a complete SCAM, which attempts to hide Totalitarianism.
Defections Shake Up Climate Coalition "Three big companies quit an influential lobbying group that had focused on shaping climate-change legislation, in the latest sign that support for an ambitious bill is melting away. ... Oil giants BP PLC and ConocoPhillips and heavy-equipment maker Caterpillar Inc. said Tuesday they won't renew their membership in the three-year-old U.S. Climate Action Partnership, a broad business-environmental coalition that had been instrumental in building support in Washington for capping emissions of greenhouse gases. The move comes as debate over climate change intensifies and concerns mount about the cost of capping greenhouse-gas emissions."
Note: Since oil is a hydrocarbon, and they're worried about carbon, they should be taxed into oblivion, forcing development of alternative energy technologies. Instead, they stand to 'make money' and continue their reign of pollution, with special thanks to the Pentagon, the largest polluter on the planet, who is exempt from all restrictions. Such logical fallacies are thrown in the faces of the entire population of the planet.
New Scientist becomes Non Scientist "You might think journalists at a popular science magazine would be able to investigate and reason. In DenierGate, watch New Scientist closely as it does the unthinkable and tries to defend gross scientific malpractice by saying it’s okay because other people have done other things (that were not related) a little bit. ..."
Note: PDF
Science & Public Policy Institute: IPCC = International Pack of Climate Crooks "Unquestionably the world’s final authority on the subject, the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change’s findings and recommendations have formed the bedrock of literally every climate-related initiative worldwide for more than a decade. Likewise, virtually all such future endeavors — be they Kyoto II, domestic cap-and-tax, or EPA carbon regulation, would inexorably be built upon the credibility of the same U.N. panel’s “expert” counsel. But a glut of ongoing recent discoveries of systemic fraud has rocked that foundation, and the entire man-made global warming house of cards is now teetering on the verge of complete collapse. ..." [full report available as a PDF download.]
UK Climate change department sends staff on more than 1,000 domestic flights after telling public to ' cut down on air travel' "The Department of Energy and Climate Change (DECC) is in charge of a multimillion advertising campaign telling the country to cut down on carbon intensive activities, such as taking domestic flights. But last year officials from DECC took just under 1,200 domestic flights, including 26 return flights to Manchester that can be reached in two-and-a-half hours by train. ... Staff from the Department for the Environment, Food and Rural Affairs (Defra), that also urges the public to fly less, took 1,938 domestic flights in 2008/09. The Government spent £35,000 on offsetting the flights, for example, by "paying for trees to be planted", and insisted "all internal flights are kept to a minimum". "
Note: Does a 'minimum' mean that they fly from A to B, and no further, each time? Doublespeak.
ClimateGate: 30 years in the making
"Mohib Ebrahim, who has created timelines for professional exhibitions, has now produced one of the ClimateGate scandal, providing graphs, e-mails, history, and analysis of events. This is the second edition, thoroughly edited and revised. ..."
The Skeptics Handbook PDF
UK: Climategate U-turn as scientist at centre of row admits: There has been no global warming since 1995 "The academic at the centre of the ‘Climategate’ affair, whose raw data is crucial to the theory of climate change, has admitted that he has trouble ‘keeping track’ of the information. Colleagues say that the reason Professor Phil Jones has refused Freedom of Information requests is that he may have actually lost the relevant papers. ...Professor Jones also conceded the possibility that the world was warmer in medieval times than now – suggesting global warming may not be a man-made phenomenon. And he said that for the past 15 years there has been no ‘statistically significant’ warming. The admissions will be seized on by sceptics as fresh evidence that there are serious flaws at the heart of the science of climate change and the orthodoxy that recent rises in temperature are largely man-made. Professor Jones has been in the spotlight since he stepped down as director of the University of East Anglia’s Climatic Research Unit after the leaking of emails that sceptics claim show scientists were manipulating data ...."
New federal climate change agency forming "..... Also known as global warming, climate change .... has drawn widespread concern in recent years as temperatures around the world rise, threatening to harm crops, spread disease, increase sea levels, change storm and drought patterns and cause polar melting.
Note: See note below.
Bill Nye the Science Guy: Climate change deniers are ‘unpatriotic’ "Appearing on MSNBC's The Rachel Maddow Show on Wednesday night, Nye scoffed that climate change deniers are "unpatriotic" in parroting simple minded, anti-science propaganda. [We] remind you that global warming was the first term for this phenomenon that we now call can climate change," he said. "So it‘s very reasonable that a snowstorm in Washington that‘s this severe is a result of climate change." ..."
Note: What a simplistic idiot. Climate always changes. Climate change does NOT 'equal' global warming. Not agreeing with the direction the change is going is NOT equivalent to 'denying that climate changes'. These people are propagandistic idiots.
UN climate change panel based claims on student dissertation and magazine article "In its most recent report, it stated that observed reductions in mountain ice in the Andes, Alps and Africa was being caused by global warming, citing two papers as the source of the information. However, it can be revealed that one of the sources quoted was a feature article published in a popular magazine for climbers which was based on anecdotal evidence from mountaineers about the changes they were witnessing on the mountainsides around them. The other was a dissertation written by a geography student, studying for the equivalent of a master's degree, at the University of Berne in Switzerland that quoted interviews with mountain guides in the Alps. ..."
IPCC Chief Pachauri's Ties to India's Largest Energy Companies "Whether the globe is caught in a climate crisis or not, the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) very much is. Not only are the UN agency’s predictions of Himalayan glacier melt have been proved to be bogus, even the very integrity of its chief R.K. Pachauri has been
challenged. The worst part of the story is that all that is giving a lot of ammunition to global warming skeptics. If the nations were working at cross-purposes at Copenhagen, splitting hairs, oblivious of the creeping danger, the fight itself could be slackened now. ... Many questions have been raised about the financial dealings of the man who was the toast of India, perhaps of the world, when he received the Nobel Prize for Peace back in 2007 along with former US Vice President Al Gore. Pachauri is listed as a founder and scientific advisor of GloriOil, a Houston, Texas-based oil technology company that specialises in recovering extra oil from declining oil fields. Critics say it is odd for a man committed to decarbonising energy supplies to be linked to an oil company. Closer home, he had been a member of the boards of the Oil and Natural Gas Commission (ONGC), Indian Oil Corporation (IOC) and National Thermal Power Corporation (NTPC), three of India's biggest public sector energy companies, all of whom by the very nature of their business contribute heavily to greenhouse gas emissions. The climate change hero was an independent director on ONGC's board for three years between June 2006 and June 2009, during which he was entitled to first-class air travel when he attended meetings, five-star hotel stays and an allowance of Rs 25,000 for each meeting attended. He lives in style in the posh Golf Links area of New Delhi. Pachauri also seems to have an awful lot of jobs, jibed Charles Clover in Sunday Times. “He already has a full-time job as director general of the Indian Energy and Resources Institute, which seems to benefit from UK government funding. He is also an adviser to Credit Suisse, Deutsche Bank and the Chicago Climate Exchange — all of which stand to benefit from carbon trading. His predecessors, Bert Bolin, a Swedish scientist, and Bob Watson, now chief scientist at Defra, were part-time, but they put enormous effort into the job. How much time is Pachauri putting in? It doesn’t appear to be a lot.” Thus the reputation of the body whose pronouncements are supposed to guide policy-making across the world is in tatters, at a time when known environmental enthusiasts are in trouble themselves."
Copenhagen accord keeps Big Carbon in business "Copenhagen was not about global warming but money. The cash that Hillary Clinton so dramatically plonked on the table, rising to $100 billion by 2020, which includes the £1.5 billion offered by Gordon Brown (money which of course he hasn't got) and which like a crazed gambler he last week upped to £6 billion (even more money he hasn't got), was merely a "sweetener" to persuade the developing countries to maintain the money-machine set in motion by Kyoto. This is the new global industry based on buying and selling the right to emit CO2, estimated soon to be worth trillions of dollars a year, which through schemes such as the UN's Clean Development Mechanism and the EU's Emissions Trading System is making a small minority of people, including Al Gore, extremely rich. ..."
Related: Protecting Big Carbon "In 2004, it was less than $300 million. But in 2005, the trade really started to soar, ending the year with $10.8 billion-worth of transactions. A year later, in 2006, the "carbon" market had grown to $31 billion. In 2007, again it more than doubled its turnover, to $64 billion. Last year, it did it again, reaching a colossal $126 billion. By 2020, some estimates suggest the annual value will reach $2 trillion. Not only does this represent a very significant business volume, its stunning growth rate makes carbon trading the hottest item in town, with banks, financial houses and independent brokers piling in to make a killing. ..."
Note: The Carbon Bubble dwarfs the subprime and credit default swap bubbles, and when this one pops, it will take the entire global economy down with it. Saved - the trillion-pound trade in carbon "This is the biggest heist in history. As they poured carbon over snow-covered Denmark from theirgas-guzzling jets, world leaders were congratulating themselves on securing a deal which will make their backers and financiers a trillion pounds a year. These riches will come from buying and selling permits, the so-called 'carbon credits' which allow industry and electricity generators in developed countries to emit carbon dioxide. The frenzied negotiations we have just seen were never about 'saving the planet'. They were always about money. ..." Australia: Federal Audit of Police Capabilities - support to the enforcement of the anticipated Carbon Pollution Reduction Scheme "No, it’s not a parody. Kevin Rudd really is creating a force of carbon cops ..."
CIA Climbs On Board The Climate Fix Scam With Satellite 'Evidence" Ploy "Leading scientists from academia, industry and government are now gaining access to information on climate change that’s collected by spy agencies. The data, which includes high resolution images taken from intelligence satellites, is helping researchers better understand changes happening to the earth as a result of global warming, such as melting ice at the poles and expanding deserts. The CIA, led by Director Leon Panetta, is running the collaborative effort that shares classified information with about 60 scientists, and the National Reconnaissance Office, which operates the nation’s fleet of spy satellites, is providing much of the data. From 1992 to 2001 Medea (Measurements of Earth Data for Environmental Analysis) shared intelligence information with scientists—until President George W. Bush shut it down. Former Vice President Al Gore is credited with helping restart the collaboration by urging Senator Dianne Feinstein (D-CA), a member of the Senate Intelligence Committee, to convince the CIA and others it was time to bring Medea back to life. ..."
Note: They have no shame. Pictures mean nothing because climate is cyclical and changes all the time.
Chronological PDF wall chart of Climategate scandal - 30 Years in the Making "Think there are no conspiracies by government and corporations to deceive the people? Here is a timeline of a big one! ..."
Note: Excellent!
History of climate gets 'erased' online "A new report reveals a British scientist and Wikipedia administrator rewrote climate history, editing more than 5,000 unique articles in the online encyclopedia to cover traces of a medieval warming period – something Climategate scientists saw as a major roadblock in the effort to spread the global warming message. ...Beginning in February 2003, William Connolley rewrote Wikipedia entries on global warming, the greenhouse effect, the instrumental temperature record, the urban heat island, on climate models and on global cooling, according to the report. In February, he began editing the Little Ice Age. By August, he began to rewrite history without the Medieval Warm Period. In October, he turned to the 'hockey-stick chart'. "He rewrote articles on the politics of global warming and on the scientists who were skeptical of the band," Solomon explains. "Richard Lindzen and Fred Singer, two of the world's most distinguished climate scientists, were among his early targets, followed by others that the band especially hated, such as Willie Soon and Sallie Baliunas of the Harvard-Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics, authorities on the Medieval Warm Period" ..... "
Analysis: "The Great Global Warming Swindle" - Produced by WAGTV (UK) VIDEO [9:47] (TRAILER) "This 2007 documentary blows the whistle on what may be the biggest swindle in modern history. Proponets of man made global warming warn that climate change is the greatest threat ever to mankind, and, if we do not change our ways and reduce CO2 emissions - polar ice caps will melt, coastal areas will flood and hurricane like Katrina will become common. With nearly Gestapo like tactics we are commanded not to question the edicts of the ICCP (oops, sorry, the IPCC - Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change). There is absolutely no room for doubt because there is a "scientific consensus." Anyone who questions the data or conclusion is an enemy of the state and humanity. Well, this is exactly what this well documented film does! Our challenge - watch this film and make up your own mind. "The Great Global Warming Swindle should be seen by everyone interested in the global enviroment, especially those who have seen the Al Gore movie." Professor William M. Gray, meterologist ..."
Note: Very Good See the Production: Part 1 [10:00] | Part 2 [10:00] | Part 3 [10:00] | Part 4 [10:00] | Part 5 [10:00] | Part 6 [10:00] | Part 7 [10:00] | Part 8 [5:56] | Russia Today Interview with Christopher Monckton VIDEO [10:22]
35 Inconvenient Truths: The errors in Al Gore’s movie PDF
Profiteering vs. Adaptation: In 1975, scientists predicted a coming ice age. Did they come up with a plan for society to adapt? No. If they had, would it have ever been put into action by politicians? No. There was no 'profit' in adaptation, only in control and manipulation. They wasted 30+ years and did nothing, and it is now upon us in an ever growing way. Humans can't change anything like the planetary climate. They can only adapt to changing conditions. Any other approach is delusional.
Al Gore "rallies the troops" in Copenhagen " .... The ultimatum to Obama was a departure for Gore who has been cautious of exerting too much pressure on the president, or causing him embarrassment. He kept up the pace by calling for the international community to sign up to a fully fledged climate change treaty by July 2010 – and then announcing that Mexico was prepared to host a deal-making summit. He scolded rich countries for demanding the developing world offer evidence of emissions cuts while at the same time trying to inflate the funds they were prepared to offer poor countries to deal with climate change. "This issue of transparency should also be applied to financial pledges of developed countries," he said. "How many times has same money been pledged two, three or even four times?" ..."
Note: Gore falsely believes that humans cause climate problems and that human action can 'alter' climate .... both false statements ... humans can only adapt to changing climates ... you don't see money being spent to install desalination plants on the African coast to offset drought-caused starvation by growing crops. Why? Because actually doing something to help the civilization adapt to changing climates is NOT on the table - only monetary 'indulgence' schemes which stand to make certain people rich, and not help anyone else. Here's another example of how real issues are being ignored: A Guyanese view of Copenhagen: What of the cash promised to save our trees? Trees absorb CO2 .. now why wouldn't they be interested? You can see the scam ... Al Gore is not who he appears to be ... clearly and transparently a spokesperson charlatan ... hard science disproves whatever he says. It's really more about world government and profiteering around the pretext of "saving the earth", when in fact it's not possible to actually do anything except adapt to changing conditions. No 'offsets' for that are even contemplated.
Ultimately Rejecting Responsibility for Anything : Copenhagen stalls decision on catastrophic climate change for six years
Note: See what I mean? Fear-motivated profit is what the 'establishment' wants, even if humans could 'change the climate' ... they're more interested in less population through climate related attrition, so that resources will give them more time to rule over others - they're not interested in anything but their own interests - it doesn't include you. It will all be taken away from them, soon, though, so you can smile and know that. I am not speaking of '2012', either, or anything else you have probably ever heard of or contemplated, nor a belief system or speculation.
UN Sponsored Poster Campaign Depicts Humans As "Evil Monsters" "A new poster campaign sponsored by the United Nations depicts humans as evil horror movie monsters intent on slaughtering wildlife, another abhorrent example of how eugenicists are following through on the Club of Rome’s 1991 promise to portray Homo sapiens as the enemy in an effort to construct a world government around the pretext of "saving the earth". The three posters reverse the roles of famous horror movies Jaws, King Kong, and Tarantula, characterizing humans as rampaging monsters out to kill defenseless species. They were produced by the Center for Migratory Species. ..."
Note: There is a great deal of self-hatred evident in the extreme environmental movement, typified by the conflicting ideas that a dam built by beavers for the beavers' use is natural but a dam built by humans for human use is not, or that human condos are artificial scars on the landscape but termite mounds, bee hives, wasp nests, and ant hills are beautiful parts of nature.
A Scheme: IPCC Chairman Connected to Firm gaining £1.2 billion from "carbon credits" | Carbon Capitalists Warming to Climate Market Using Derivatives | WSJ: Climategate: Follow the Money | Key players cashing in on Chicago Climate Exchange | Al Gore Set To Become First “Carbon Billionaire” | Organized Crime in Charge of EU Carbon Trade, Europol Says "Europe’s top police body Europol has exposed a massive fraud with the official market in carbon credits, the Emission Trading System. VIDEO [3:09] ..." Green pot of "carbon gold" lures politicians | Extraordinary conjecture is utilized to rationalize the removal of forests "Climategate does not just demonstrate the corruption of science and peer-review; it also demonstrates the incompetence of specialists who do not understand planetary ecology ..." Climategate: with business interests like these are we really sure Dr Rajendra Pachauri is fit to head the IPCC? | Gore Not Interested In ' Solutions' To ' Climate Change' That Don’t Line His Pockets | A Message to the Environmental Movement: Your movement has been hijacked VIDEO [9:12]
JP Morgan employee who invented Credit Default Swaps, is a key architect of Carbon Derivatives (which are the center of " Cap and Trade" concept)
Related: "The woman who built financial 'weapon of mass destruction' "In the article below we said that Blythe Masters of JP Morgan developed the credit derivatives which were at the heart of the current financial crisis. We apologise for unfairly failing to give her an adequate opportunity to respond and for making inaccurate personal references about her. The guide to which we referred was a general guide to credit derivatives and not just about those she created; she was 34, rather than 35, when she became chief financial officer of JP Morgan; and she was not working in hospital before having her baby, but viewing financial data to pass the time. ..... British-born Masters is one of the most powerful women on Wall Street and is widely recognised as one of an elite group dubbed the "JP Morgan mafia" that fostered the creation of the complex credit derivatives at the heart of the current crisis ripping through Wall Street. Many of the highly qualified mathematicians and academics who worked on the credit derivatives market in the early days have gone on to run hedge funds and into high-powered jobs at other investment banks, but most of them started out at JP Morgan. ... Masters was raised in south-east England, where she attended the exclusive King's public school in Canterbury on a scholarship. She got a economics degree from Cambridge, and from the beginning had been attracted to the esoteric world of derivatives. In her spare time, she is a keen horsewoman. She joined the JP Morgan commodities desk and worked her way up the organisation. At the age of 35 she was appointed chief financial officer of the investment bank, but for the past two years has been head of currencies and commodities. Her focus on the job reached almost comic levels when she famously took her wireless device into the hospital to get quotes on commodity derivatives as she was having a baby. The banks argued that by trading credit derivatives of the kind pioneered by Masters, they had spread their risk elsewhere and therefore needed lower reserves to protect against loan defaults. Regulators rolled over and the banks loaned ever more. It was a huge success and the market for credit derivatives grew rapidly. But the instruments might not have much longer. One of the fall-outs from the current crisis is the call that banks should carry their own risk."
Note 1: The story of Blythe Masters and the group at J.P. Morgan who created the credit derivatives that figured so prominently in the financial crash of 2007-08 has been documented (and verified) by Gillian Tett of the FInancial Times, in her book, Fool’s Gold: How the Bold Dream of a Small Tribe at J.P. Morgan Was Corrupted by Wall Street Greed and Unleashed a Catastrophe (Free Press, 2009). Tett quotes Masters’ SIFMA address on p. 250. It’s a gripping book that also has the best explanation of all the different complex securities that were part of the story: credit default swaps, collateralized debt obligations, asset-backed securities, etc. ..."
David Rothschild regrets Global Governance tough to activate with VIDEO [0:57] ""Simon Linnett, Executive Vice-Chairman of Rothschild, has called for a new international body, the World Environment Agency, to regulate carbon trading. In a recently published paper, Trading Emissions, for the Social Market Foundation, Mr Linnett argues that the International problem of climate change demands an international solution. Unless governments cede some of their sovereignty to a new world body, he says, a global carbon trading scheme cannot be enforced and regulated." David Rothschild regrets that Global Governance is proving very hard to activate at the UN climate conference in Copenhagen. ..."
Note: These people are part of the criminal 'carbon trading' enterprise, crafted by Blythe Masters of JP Morgan, creator of the 'credit default swap', which ruined the global economy.
The People Paradox: Self-Esteem Striving, Immortality Ideologies, and Human Response to Climate Change "In 1973, Ernest Becker, a cultural anthropologist cross-trained in philosophy, sociology, and psychiatry, invoked consciousness of self and the inevitability of death as the primary sources of human anxiety and repression. He proposed that the psychological basis of cooperation, competition, and emotional and mental health is a tendency to hold tightly to anxiety-buffering cultural world views or "immortality projects" that serve as the basis for self-esteem and meaning. Although he focused mainly on social and political outcomes like war, torture, and genocide, he was increasingly aware that materialism, denial of nature, and immortality-striving efforts to control, rather than sanctify, the natural world were problems whose severity was increasing. In this paper I review Becker's ideas and suggest ways in which they illuminate human response to global climate change. Because immortality projects range from belief in technology and materialism to reverence for nature or belief in a celestial god, they act both as barriers to and facilitators of sustainable practices. I propose that Becker’s cross-disciplinary "science of man," and the predictions it generates for proximate-level determinants of social behavior, add significantly to our understanding of and potential for managing the people paradox, i.e., that the very things that bring us symbolic immortality often conflict with our prospects for survival. Analysis of immortality projects as one of the proximate barriers to addressing climate change is both cautionary and hopeful, providing insights that should be included in the cross-disciplinary quest to uncover new pathways toward rational, social change. ..."
Disinformation Tactics: The Methods Used To Keep You In The Dark "here was a time, not too long ago (relatively speaking), that governments and the groups of elites that controlled them did not find it necessary to conscript themselves into wars of disinformation. Propaganda was relatively straightforward. The lies were much simpler. The control of information flow was easily directed. In fact, during the early Middle-Ages ...."
Lord Monckton on Bonn Climate Conference: New treaty, new world government
Note and Accurate Bottom Line: Climates have always changed; human presence doesn't figure significantly at all into the mix; there is nothing humans can do to alter the climate dynamics on Earth. The people at 'the top' (the bottom) are stuck in an existential greed loop; no civilization lasts forever; the civilization has a limited time left (not so much because of climate, but something else, although climate changes would, if time went on, decimate the civilization) ; since we are not our bodies, we survive the experience here. End of story. It will have just been an experience for all of us; We have more experience coming after this. Don't worry. For more on Climate and other topics in the the ongoing dog and pony show, see the Leading Edge Research Journal Online..